Say, you believe that the success of the team is more important than personal goals, ambition, and achievements.
If that were the case, what type of management style do you think you’d prefer?
Would you want a supportive, inclusive leader offering you relative autonomy? A work environment where everyone can freely voice their opinions and concerns and stand out from the crowd?
Or would you want a directive, authoritarian leader within a company culture where harmony is more important than self-expression?
We’ve talked about how collectivist cultures view the “group” as more important than self. We’ve also discussed that the “group” differs across cultures.
As to the latter, two styles of leadership are applied in varying degrees across cultures: directive and supportive leadership. Let’s take a look at both.
What makes a directive leader?
Here are some directive leadership behaviors:
- Being task-oriented
- Demonstrating control over subordinates
- Dominating interactions
- Personally managing the completion of tasks
- Supervising closely
- Pressuring employees to complete targets accurately and efficiently
- Focusing on time management
With a directive leader, employees are placed in a role of dependency – depending on the leader to direct every aspect of their task, including how and when to move forward. Employees under directive leaders often demonstrate little personal initiative.
A number of studies have shown directive leadership often contributes to lesser satisfaction and team cohesion. Moreover, directive leadership unsurprisingly leads to less open communication.
However, directive leadership can also result in higher productivity.
What makes a supportive leader?
Here are some supportive leadership behaviors:
- Meeting employee needs/preferences
- Showing concern for employee welfare, individual/group needs, and conflict within the group
- Encouraging a supportive work environment
- Providing positive feedback
- Fostering team cohesion and openness
- Inviting employees to be part of the decision-making process
- Promoting positive morale
- Facilitating discussions (as opposed to dominating them)
With a supportive leader, employees are provided more autonomy and encouraged to demonstrate personal initiative and to be individuals within a cohesive group dynamic.
Studies have shown supportive environments can empower and promote positive dependency among team members, despite being open to more potential conflict as a result of open communication and individual expression.
In his study on “Rights and Responsibilities of Dissent: Cooperative Conflict,” Dean Tjosvold concludes that:
“…asserting the right to self-expression contributes to establishing a conflict-positive climate in which differences and frustrations can be discussed openly.”
The hard part when managing across cultures is finding that fine line between cooperative conflict and just plain conflict.
Next week, we’ll discuss the hybrid leadership style that combines directive and supportive leadership. Stay tuned.